USA Firearms Issues
Understanding The “Why” Behind The Creation Of The “Gun Violence” Myth
Time and again throughout history, the disarmament of a people has led to tyranny, then the government-led genocide of unfavored populations.
Posted by Bob Owens on May 14, 2015 at 9:40 am
The headline out of Chicago this morning is sadly predictable.
While Baltimore captured media attention for the suspicious death of Freddy Gray, Gray’s peers continued doing what they do best.
A opinion piece out of New York offers an attempt to find a cure.
Indeed, the mainstream media in major cities and their equally compromised allies in the field of public health and the like-minded politicians they have rallied around continue to push the abject fiction of “gun violence,” as if the argument has any logical merit whatsoever.
The very concept of “object violence” is, of course, absurd on its face.
When someone is intentionally run over with a car, we do not attack the automobile industry for the vehicle’s misuse, nor do we attempt to then constrict the ability of other drivers to buy and drive that model of car.
When someone is intentionally beaten with a bat, we do not call out the manufacturer of that bat, nor the larger baseball industry, and insist that they are culpable for the misuse of that product.
Do we really need to go down a list of further examples? I don’t see that we do. I think you understand the idiocy of their argument against reason.
These totalitarian control freaks—which is what they are, if we may be honest—are attempting to turn a criminal violence issue into an object violence issue.
They seek to blame objects used by more than 100 million Americans for sport, sustenance, and personal protection billions of times each year (based on ammunition consumption) because if they successfully press their argument, they can twist the actions of the criminal few to disarm the law-abiding masses.
This totalitarian desire to disarm the good and decent people of the United States before a federal government that grows more corrupt and lawless every day should strike fear into the hearts of decent people, and for very good reasons.
Time and again throughout history, the disarmament of a people has led to tyranny, then the government-led genocide of unfavored populations. This murder by government is called Democide.
It may seem like a giant leap from the false promises of peace through disarmament to democide, but history does not lie.
262 million souls were summarily murdered by their own governments in the 20th Century. Typically, their “crimes” were nothing more than being the wrong race, the wrong ethnic group, the wrong ideological persuasion, a member of the wrong political party, having the wrong friends or family members, or simply being in the wrong place, at the wrong time when the purge began.
It would be nice to pretend that people have evolved in the span of the few years since that murderous, democide-filled 20th century, but we know that to be a lie as well. The very same people Mr. Grathwohl warned us about in the video above are the ideological parents of our sitting President, his Rasputin, Valerie Jarrett, and the other radical supporters of the concept of a all-knowing, all-seeing, all-powerful federal government, one far unlike that our Founders intended.
“Gun Violence” isn’t a threat to the long-term health of the citizens of the United States.
It is the ideology pushing the idea of “gun violence” that is a malignancy in our body politic that would destroy this nation from within.
Founding Father Patrick Henry warned us long ago.
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”
Those who have failed to heed that warning lie mouldering in mass graves around the world.
Do not let that same fate befall us.
Do not buy into the “gun violence” lie that would turn a well-armed citizenry into mere subjects.
How Dangerous is Hunting in the USA, Really?
Brock Ray (From Interstate Sportsman – USA)
Here are the figures on how safe this blood sport really is.
How can a sport where adults and the young run around the woods and over water while carrying loaded firearms really be safe? Each hunting season newspapers and television news broadcasts inform the public of hunting tragedies ranging from accidental shootings and drowning, to fatal falls from tree stands. Is hunting just an accident waiting to happen? I mean, is it really so dangerous that even the Vice-President of the United States is not safe to join on a hunting trip to the woods?
Most, but not all hunting accidents involve firearms. In the United States accidental deaths involving firearms comprise less than 1 percent of accidental deaths or about 700 deaths a year nationwide annually. In a recent report from the National Safety Council, a nonprofit public service organization, revealed an amazing 48 percent decline in accidental firearm-related deaths in the past decade.
According to the National Safety Council, which keeps tabs on accidents in its “Injury Facts 2005-2006” publication, no other category of accidental death has declined as much in recent years. Some statistics from the National Safety Council: The average Americans chances of dying are as follows, which means we need to put restrictions on furniture.
In any accident: 1 in 23
By a vehicle while walking: 1 in 612
Fall from bed, chair, furniture: 1 in 4745
Firearm accident: 1 in 4888
It is worth noting that annually, fatal hunting accidents occur at a rate of 80 to 90 persons per year. That is only 12 to 15 percent of the national average of deaths by accident use of firearms. Conversely, each year in the United States, there are 1,500 to 1,800 people that drown, and another 800 to 875 people killed in boating accidents. Ironically, hunting accidents are one of the few categories of fatal accidents that have been in decline over the past to decades.
Mandatory Hunter Safety Classes are credited with this remarkable occurrence.
Duke Researcher in USA Shows Cars are 80% Risker Than Guns ….
Posted by Bob Owens, 2015
If you do, it might spur people to dig into your claims, and them show you to be a complete and utter fool:
This argument in turn has stimulated a very cogent rebuttal by Eugene Volokh as well as a Facebook page by Second Amendment advocates arguing that this actually would be a huge improvement over current federal and state gun control laws which now place far more restrictions on gun owners than do parallel laws governing automobile ownership.
There’s no point in rehashing these arguments. There clearly is a critical difference between the regulatory regimes governing guns and autos. Guns tend to be regulated as if they are obviously inherently dangerous and must be carefully controlled (in terms of who is permitted to own them, whether they can be displayed in public, even how they must be stored if children are in the house). In contrast, there seems to be no equivalent presumption about cars whose rules regarding ownership and use seem far less restrictive. That is, virtually anyone (including the mentally ill, past criminals etc.) may own a car and do whatever they want with it on private property. One needs a car license only if driving on public streets.
This puzzles me in light of the available empirical evidence:
- There were 310 million guns in the U.S. in 2009 (a Congressional Research Service figure I have no reason to dispute), a figure that likely grew to perhaps 350 million by 2013.
- These guns result in ~33,000 deaths in 2013, of which 64% were suicides, leaving ~500 accidental deaths and 11,200 due to homicides (these are official CDC figures reported in Table 10)
- There were 269 millionregistered vehicles in the U.S. in 2013.
- These result in ~33,000deaths a year, roughly half of which are drivers (these are official NHTSA statistics).
Conover crunched the numbers, and made a discovery that won’t make the meme-makers very happy.
…in light of these eye-opening but indisputable facts, why is gun ownership so vilified by progressives? They could save literally 25 times as many lives by convincing a single typical car owner to drive more responsibly than convincing a single typical gun owner to use their weapon more responsibly. Instead of derisively sneering at those who “cling to guns” out of bitterness, perhaps they ought to ask themselves why guns rather than cars invite their scorn.
Of course, none of this matters to anti-gun Democrats, as they don’t care about facts or logic or lives, for that matter.
What they care about is control, and power over the citizenry. They will always push for gun control, because they believe to their cores that liberty is dangerous.
Maryland “gun fingerprint” database shut down without solving a single case. Sounded like a great idea for the bureaucrats but ……
Maryland “gun fingerprint” database shut down without solving a single case
For gun control advocates, it sure sounded like a great idea. Why not force gun purchasers to fire a round at the police station so that the ballistic “fingerprint” of the firearm could be catalogued? That way, police could find the perpetrator every time a gun was used in a crime. What could go wrong?
Plenty, according to the Baltimore Sun’s Erin Cox. Fifteen years, millions of dollars, and 340,000 shell casings later, Maryland decided last week to scrap the system … after failing to solve one single crime in its existence (via PJ Media):
Since 2000, the state required that gun manufacturers fire every handgun to be sold here and send the spent bullet casing to authorities. The idea was to build a database of “ballistic fingerprints” to help solve future crimes.
But the system — plagued by technological problems — never solved a single case. Now the hundreds of thousands of accumulated casings could be sold for scrap.
“Obviously, I’m disappointed,” said former Gov. Parris N. Glendening, a Democrat whose administration pushed for the database to fulfill a campaign promise. “It’s a little unfortunate, in that logic and common sense suggest that it would be a good crime-fighting tool.”
The amount of money wasted for Maryland taxpayers? Five million dollars, which isn’t the worst boondoggle in recent memory, but it’s bad enough. It would have been worse if the state had actually continued to operate the system for the entire fifteen years, but it gave up over eight years ago without bothering to end the program. Instead, the state legislature finally pulled the plug:
But the computerized system designed to sort and match the images never worked as envisioned. In 2007, the state stopped bothering to take the photographs, though hundreds of thousands more casings kept piling up in the fallout shelter. And even when the state did operate the system, they didn’t operate it competently. Worse, the system Maryland bought created images so imprecise that when an investigator submitted a crime scene casing, the database software would sometimes spit out hundreds of matches. The state sued the manufacturer in 2009 for $1.9 million, settling three years later for $390,000.
Republicans in Maryland tried ending the program twice, in 2005 and again in 2013. Democrats blocked those efforts both times despite the failures in both Maryland’s system and a similar one in New York, which shut down in 2012. When Martin O’Malley got a gun-control law passed in 2014, it created a surge in sales that ended up burying the state police in spent shell casings, requiring eight staffers to be hired to deal with the 60,000 fresh samples. Just warehousing and maintaining the shell casings cost “several hundred thousand dollars a year,” according to the Baltimore Sun.
What lessons are we to learn here? Perhaps the first lesson is that no idea is so nonsensical that it can’t be turned into a government program, especially when the topic is gun control. Even now, some of the program’s defenders insist that it takes 15 years for this kind of project to ripen because guns tend to get stolen and used in crimes long after their initial sale. However, even if that’s true, then the ballistic fingerprints will get investigators nowhere except to find the victim of a prior robbery. It still won’t solve the extant crime.
Meanwhile, Maryland will bury itself in used shell casings and pay for storage and personnel in order to solve no crimes at all. Those resources would be put to much better use if they funded more investigators rather than more bureaucrats and stock clerks. Those are the priorities that matter in law enforcement, but appear to matter less to politicians looking for headlines to assuage gun-control advocates.
Addendum: It’s worth noting, as Glenn Reynolds does, that the impact of gun-control laws often have more adverse impacts than just excessive spending:
Cottrol noted that crimes like carrying or owning a pistol without a license are what the law has traditionally termed malum prohibitum — that is, things that are wrong only because they are prohibited. (The contrast is with the other traditional category, malum in se, those things, like rape, robbery, and murder, that are wrong in themselves.)
Traditionally, penalties for malum prohibitum acts were generally light, since the conduct that the laws governed wasn’t wrong in itself. But modern American law often treats even obscure and technical violations of gun laws as felonies and — Cottrol noted — prosecutors often go out of their way to prosecute these crimes more vigorously even than traditional crimes like rape or murder.
Cottrol discussed a number of such cases, including that of Melroy Cort, a double-amputee Iraq veteran who in 2006 was traveling to Walter Reed Army Hospital for treatment from Ohio. He was charged with possession of a pistol not registered in the District of Columbia (though he said he had a permit in Ohio), a felony that would not only have sent him to prison, but would have cost him his veterans’ benefits. Although, as Cottrol notes, prosecutors in the DC Attorney General’s office had discretion to drop the charges; they instead threw the book at him. …
Want to reduce crime? Punish criminals. Don’t lock up peaceable citizens on a technicality. And stop putting foolish roadblocks up for legitimate gun ownership as well.